Practice patterns versus practice guidelines in pediatric otitis media. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To study the practice patterns of physicians and their adherence to an evidence-based practice guideline (PG) on pediatric otitis media with effusion. We hypothesized that overall knowledge of the recommendations from the guidelines would be less than 75%, and that specialist physicians would have better knowledge of the recommendations than generalist physicians. METHODS: We performed a survey study of 1167 otolaryngologists, pediatricians, and pediatric otolaryngologists. Each physician was sent a 6-item survey asking about their practice patterns and treatment preferences for young children with otitis media with effusion. We compared responses between different specialties. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 48%. Only 8 (1.4%) of the 558 responding physicians answered all 6 items congruent with the PG. Overall, pediatricians, otolaryngologists, and pediatric otolaryngologists had similar total scores, but different scores on individual items. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the practice patterns of pediatricians, otolaryngologists, and pediatric otolaryngologists differ from the recommendations of an evidence-based PG. In particular, 2 items covering key treatment recommendations were answered in agreement with the PG by fewer than half of the physicians. It is not clear from this study whether these discrepancies were due to poor dissemination or knowledge concerning the PG, or disagreement with its recommendations.

publication date

  • May 1, 2001

Research

keywords

  • Otitis Media with Effusion
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 0035344112

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1067/mhn.2001.115497

PubMed ID

  • 11337650

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 124

issue

  • 5