Second liver resections are safe and effective treatment for recurrent hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a bi-institutional analysis. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of repeat liver resection for recurrent colorectal metastases to the liver. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Liver resection represents the best and a potentially curative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver. After resection, however, most patients develop recurrent disease, often isolated to the liver. METHODS: This study reports the combined experience of repeat liver resection for recurrent liver metastases at an American and a European surgical oncology center. Patients were identified from prospective databases and records were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 126 patients (American n = 96, 1986-2001; European n = 30, 1985-1999) underwent repeat liver resection. Patient characteristics were similar in the two institutions. Median follow-up from first liver resection was 88 and 105 months, respectively. RESULTS: Operations performed included 90 minor resections and 36 resections of a lobe or more. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 86%, 51%, and 34%. There were 19 actual 5-year survivors to date. By multivariate regression analysis (proportional hazard model), more than one lesion and tumor size larger than 5 cm were independent prognostic indicators of reduced survival. The interval between the first and second liver resection was not predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases is safe. Patients with a low tumor load are the best candidates for a repeat resection. In well-selected patients, further resection of the liver can provide prolonged survival after recurrence of colorectal liver metastases.

publication date

  • June 1, 2002

Research

keywords

  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Hepatectomy
  • Liver Neoplasms
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC1422517

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 0036106783

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1097/00000658-200206000-00015

PubMed ID

  • 12035044

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 235

issue

  • 6