Impact of vaginal surgery for stress urinary incontinence on female sexual function: is the use of polypropylene mesh detrimental? Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively the impact of a distal urethral polypropylene sling on sexual function using a validated questionnaire. Suburethral slings are currently the most common anti-incontinence surgery performed. Although the use of polypropylene is safe and effective, concern exists that the presence of the material in the vagina may adversely affect sexual function. METHODS: A total of 29 patients agreed to participate in this prospective study. The patients were evaluated with the Female Sexual Function Index, a validated, 19-item questionnaire that assesses six domains of sexual function: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The questionnaires were administered at 6-month intervals during the follow-up visits. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 52 years (range 38 to 72). The mean duration of follow-up was 19.4 months (range 7 to 37). No statistically significant difference was found in sexual function after placement of a distal urethral polypropylene sling. Of the 29 patients, 14% were not sexually active before or after surgery. No statistically significant difference was found between preoperative and postoperative desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. CONCLUSIONS: No change was found in overall sexual function in women undergoing placement of a mid to distal polypropylene urethral sling. Specifically, neither a deleterious effect nor statistically significant improvement was found in sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, or pain compared with the preoperative baseline values.

publication date

  • February 1, 2005

Research

keywords

  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prostheses and Implants
  • Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological
  • Surgical Mesh
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 13844292789

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.urology.2004.08.058

PubMed ID

  • 15708036

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 65

issue

  • 2