Metallic shedding, surface finish changes, and extensive femoral osteolysis in the loose Spectron EF stem. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • UNLABELLED: The addition of a proximal rough surface finish in the satin finish Spectron stem (Spectron EF) reportedly does not alter its clinical performance. However, we have revised 15 Spectron EF stems because of aseptic loosening and extensive femoral osteolysis at early and intermediate-term followup, raising a question as to its safety. We sought to determine which interface has aseptic failure, the presence of massive femoral osteolysis, and the consequences of loosening at the implant-cement interface in the implant's surface finish. Fifteen patients with aseptic loosening of a proximal rough surface-finished Spectron EF stem at intermediate-term followup (Group A) were compared with seven patients having revisions of the same stem for infection or recurrent dislocation but without loosening (Group B). Radiographs for Group A showed debonding at the cement-implant interface and stem subsidence in 13 hips, and severe femoral osteolysis in seven, including two pathologic periprosthetic fractures. During revision surgery, all 13 subsided stems showed a metallic stained pseudomembrane and metallic shedding with polishing of the stem surface. None of the patients in Group B who had revision surgery had these changes. Aseptic failure of the Spectron EF stem was characterized by debonding, subsidence, and metallic shedding with concomitant massive femoral osteolysis and metallosis, which is similar to conditions reported for loose, rough cemented stems, but has not been reported for the satin finish Spectron stem. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III (retrospective comparative study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

publication date

  • January 1, 2006

Research

keywords

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
  • Hip Joint
  • Hip Prosthesis
  • Joint Diseases
  • Osteolysis

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 33645090218

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1097/01.blo.0000181145.01306.f9

PubMed ID

  • 16394756

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 442