Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: effect of prior biopsy on success of sperm retrieval. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • PURPOSE: We determined the effect of prior biopsies with no sperm seen on the chance of sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 311 men with NOA underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Of these patients 135 underwent no prior biopsies, 159 underwent 1 or 2 diagnostic testicular biopsies per testis and 17 underwent 3 or 4. The outcome measure studied was the success of sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone and histopathological diagnosis were examined as predictive factors for sperm recovery. RESULTS: Spermatozoa were retrieved in 150 men by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (48%). The success of sperm retrieval in patients who underwent 3 to 4 biopsies (23%) was lower than the retrieval rate in patients who underwent no prior biopsies (56%) and 1 to 2 biopsies per testis (51%) (p = 0.04). When histopathology was considered, patients with Sertoli-cell-only diagnosis on prior diagnostic biopsy had lower retrieval rates compared to the group with no biopsies (p = 0.02). Men with maturation arrest and hypospermatogenesis had similar microdissection testicular sperm extraction sperm retrieval rates regardless of the number of prior biopsies. Spermatozoa recovery was independent of serum follicle-stimulating hormone. CONCLUSIONS: There is no threshold of prior negative biopsies that precludes the success of sperm retrieval using microdissection testicular sperm extraction. A limited number of testicular biopsies provide limited or no prognostic value for sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

publication date

  • April 1, 2007

Research

keywords

  • Azoospermia
  • Microdissection
  • Spermatozoa
  • Testis
  • Tissue and Organ Harvesting

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 33947200602

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.039

PubMed ID

  • 17382751

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 177

issue

  • 4