A prospective randomised controlled trial of autologous retransfusion in total knee replacement. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • We undertook a prospective randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of autologous retransfusion drains in reducing the need for allogenic blood requirement after unilateral total knee replacement. We also monitored the incidence of post-operative complications. There were 86 patients in the control group, receiving standard care with a vacuum drain, and 92 who received an autologous drain and were retransfused postoperatively. Following serial haemoglobin measurements at 24, 48 and 72 hours, we found no difference in the need for allogenic blood between the two groups (control group 15.1%, retransfusion group 13% (p = 0.439)). The incidence of post-operative complications, such as wound infection, deep-vein thrombosis and chest infection, was also comparable between the groups. There were no adverse reactions associated with the retransfusion of autologous blood. Based on this study, the cost-effectiveness and continued use of autologous drains in total knee replacement should be questioned.

publication date

  • April 1, 2008

Research

keywords

  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
  • Blood Transfusion, Autologous
  • Drainage
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Postoperative Complications

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 42149140650

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20044

PubMed ID

  • 18378918

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 90

issue

  • 4