Response to endothelin-1 in arteries from human colorectal tumours: role of endothelin receptors. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • To examine the reaction of tumour arteries to endothelin-1, we obtained arteries supplying blood flow to colorectal tumours from patients, as well as mesenteric arteries supplying the normal colon tissue from the same patients and mesenteric arteries from patients without a colorectal tumour pathology. The contraction in response to endothelin-1 and the relaxation produced by bradykinin was recorded in each of these arteries. Accordingly, the sensitivity to endothelin-1 but not the maximal response, was higher in the arteries supplying colorectal tumours than in mesenteric arteries supplying normal colon or in mesenteric arteries from patients with no tumour pathology. The contraction produced by endothelin-1 was not modified by exposure to L-NAME or meclofenamate in arteries supplying both the tumour and the normal colon. The endothelin ET(A) andET(B) receptors were expressed similarly in arteries supplying the tumour or normal colon. However, the antagonist of the endothelin ET(B) receptors BQ788 (10(-6) M) decreased the contractions in the arteries supplying the tumour but not in those supplying the normal colon. By contrast, the antagonist of endothelin ET(A) receptors BQ123 (10(-6) M) reduced the contraction equally in both these types of arteries. Likewise, in arteries precontracted with U46619, the relaxation in response to bradykinin was similar in all three types of arteries. Together, these results suggest that the arteries supplying human colorectal tumours are more sensitive to endothelin-1, which could be due to the enhanced activity of endothelin ET(B) receptors in the absence of any change in the modulatory effect of nitric oxide or prostanoids in the arterial response to this peptide.

publication date

  • October 10, 2008

Research

keywords

  • Arteries
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Endothelin-1
  • Receptors, Endothelin
  • Vasoconstriction

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 58749086092

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.3181/0802-RM-69

PubMed ID

  • 18849535

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 233

issue

  • 12