Bone void fillers. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • For this technology overview, the tools of evidence-based medicine were used to summarize information on the effectiveness and clinical outcomes related to the usage of bone void fillers- specifically, synthetic graft materials. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted to address five key questions, which the task force that prepared the report posed as follows. Question 1 addressed the use of synthetic bone void fillers alone. Question 2 was designed to determine whether synthetic bone void fillers could successfully serve as graft extenders and eliminate the need for iliac crest bone graft. Questions 3, 4, and 5 addressed the use of allografts as a comparison with synthetic fillers because clinical results with allografts are perceived as being much closer to autografts in these areas of the spine.

publication date

  • September 1, 2010

Research

keywords

  • Bone Substitutes
  • Bone Transplantation
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 77956677451

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.5435/00124635-201009000-00009

PubMed ID

  • 20810939

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 18

issue

  • 9