Endoscopic versus operative gastrostomy: final results of a prospective randomized trial. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • This study compared operative gastrostomy (OG) (by surgeons) with endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) (by physicians) in a prospective randomized fashion to determine whether one technique was superior. PEG (Sachs-Vine) and OG (Stamm) were done using local anesthesia. Patients were assessed for complications, mortality, tube function, and cost. Groups were equally matched for indications and underlying disease. Fifty-seven had OG and 64 had attempted PEG. Complications occurred in 26% of OG patients and 9% died. Complications occurred in 25% of PEG patients and 12% died. Tube feeding was initiated in both groups within a mean of 29 (24 to 72) hours of the gastrostomy placement. OG cost $1675 and PEG $979 to perform. Twenty-one PEG patients required endoscopic tube change which raised their total cost to $1574. We conclude there is no difference between OG (using local anesthesia) and PEG with regard to morbidity, mortality, or tube function. The endoscopic technique does appear to have economic advantage.

publication date

  • January 1, 1990

Research

keywords

  • Gastroscopy
  • Gastrostomy

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 0025064114

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/s0016-5107(90)70911-x

PubMed ID

  • 2107116

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 36

issue

  • 1