ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on nonpalpable mammographic findings (excluding calcifications). Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Screening mammography can detect breast cancer before it becomes clinically apparent. However, the screening process identifies many false-positive findings for each cancer eventually confirmed. Additional tools are available to help differentiate spurious findings from real ones and to help determine when tissue sampling is required, when short-term follow-up will suffice, or whether the finding can be dismissed as benign. These tools include additional diagnostic mammographic views, breast ultrasound, breast MRI, and, when histologic evaluation is required, percutaneous biopsy. The imaging evaluation of a finding detected at screening mammography proceeds most efficiently, cost-effectively, and with minimization of radiation dose when approached in an evidence-based manner. The appropriateness of the above-referenced tools is presented here as they apply to a variety of findings often encountered on screening mammography; an algorithmic approach to workup of these potential scenarios is also included. The recommendations put forth represent a compilation of evidence-based data and expert opinion of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) Expert Panel on Breast Imaging.

publication date

  • December 1, 2010

Research

keywords

  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Diagnostic Imaging
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Mass Screening
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84928095997

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.07.006

PubMed ID

  • 21129682

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 7

issue

  • 12