The removal of acetabular bone in hip resurfacing and cementless total hip replacement: a comparison using the ratio of the size of the acetabular component to the diameter of the native femoral head. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of acetabular bone removed during hip resurfacing (HR) and cementless total hip replacement (THR), after controlling for the diameter of the patient's native femoral head. Based on a power analysis, 64 consecutive patients (68 hips) undergoing HR or THR were prospectively enrolled in the study. The following data were recorded intra-operatively: the diameter of the native femoral head, the largest reamer used, the final size of the acetabular component, the size of the prosthetic femoral head and whether a decision was made to increase the size of the acetabular component in order to accommodate a larger prosthetic femoral head. Results were compared using two-sided, independent samples Student's t-tests. A statistically significant difference was seen in the mean ratio of the size of the acetabular component to the diameter of the native femoral head (HR: 1.05 (SD 0.04) versus THR: 1.09 (SD 0.05); p < 0.001) and largest acetabular reamer used to the diameter of the native femoral head (HR: 1.03 (SD 0.04) versus THR: 1.09 (SD 0.05); p < 0.001). The ratios varied minimally when the groups were subdivided by gender, age and obesity. The decision to increase the size of the acetabular component to accommodate a larger femoral head occurred more often in the THR group (27% versus 9%). Despite the emphasis on avoiding damage to the femoral neck during HR, the ratio of the size of the acetabular component to the diameter of the native femoral head was larger in cementless THR than in HR.

publication date

  • October 1, 2012

Research

keywords

  • Acetabulum
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
  • Femur

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84867306262

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1302/0301-620X.94B10.28452

PubMed ID

  • 23015557

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 94

issue

  • 10