Pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: adherence and accuracy of the recent guidelines. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVES: The 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines recommend pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy. We sought to examine the adherence to the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and to test the their accuracy, as well as the accuracy of the most contemporary National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Urological Association, and European Association of Urology guidelines to predict lymph node metastases. METHODS: A total of 33 037 radical prostatectomy patients were identified, between 2004 and 2006. Adherence to the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines was calculated using three clinically plausible cut-offs: 2, 5 and 10%. The accuracy was tested using the area under the curve. RESULTS: Overall, 63% of patients underwent pelvic lymph node dissection. Of those, 61, 49 and 45% were managed according to the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline cut-off of 2, 5 and 10%, respectively. The accuracy of all the examined guidelines ranged from 61% to 71%. The highest accuracy was recorded for the European Association of Urology and the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network cut-off 5% guidelines. The lowest accuracy was recorded for the most contemporary National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines was suboptimal. The accuracy of all the examined guidelines ranged from 61% to 71%. None of the examined guidelines can be regarded as an ideal indication for pelvic lymph node dissection.

publication date

  • October 8, 2012

Research

keywords

  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Lymph Node Excision
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic Neoplasms

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84875805414

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03171.x

PubMed ID

  • 23039245

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 20

issue

  • 4