The prompted optional randomization trial: a new design for comparative effectiveness research. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard for medical evidence because randomization provides the best-known protection against confounding of results. Randomization has practical and ethical problems that limit the number of trials that can be conducted, however. A different method for collecting clinical data retains the statistically useful properties of randomization without incurring its practical and ethical challenges. A computerized prompt introduces a random element into clinical decision-making that can be instantly overridden if it conflicts with optimal patient care. This creates a weak form of randomization that still eliminates the effect of all confounders, can be carried out without disturbing routine clinical care, and arguably will not require research-grade informed consent.

publication date

  • October 18, 2012

Research

keywords

  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC3519302

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84869151367

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301036

PubMed ID

  • 23078493

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 102

issue

  • 12