Charlson score as a single pertinent criterion to select candidates for active surveillance among patients with small renal masses.

Overview

abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the outcome after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) of patients with small renal masses (SRMs) who would have been eligible for active surveillance (AS). METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively for 758 patients who underwent NSS over a 5-year period. Outcomes were assessed in two groups of patients who were eligible for AS according to different criteria. Group 1 criteria were as follows: age >75 years, renal mass ≤4 cm, significant comorbidities [Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) >2]. Group 2 criteria were as follows: any SRM ≤ 4 cm regardless of age, severe comorbidities with a 10-year mortality risk >50 % (CCI > 4). The two groups were not compared statistically because some patients were included in both. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (7.3 %) were included in Group 1 and 62 (8.2 %) in Group 2. There was a significant proportion of benign tumours in Group 1 (N = 6; 11 %) and Group 2 (N = 6; 10 %). Six (11 %) positive margins were observed in Group 1 and 8 (13 %) in Group 2. The 2- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 100 and 77.4 %, respectively, in Group 1, and 88.5 and 79.6 % in Group 2. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 100 and 74.7 % in Group 1, and 96.7 and 78.1 % in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with SRMs who would have been eligible for AS had no recurrence after initial tumour removal. In these patients, a CCI > 4 appeared to be a pertinent criterion to identify those patients less likely to benefit from immediate surgery.