Femoral neck fractures: a changing paradigm. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Surgical interventions consisting of internal fixation (IF) or total hip replacement (THR) are required to restore patient mobility after hip fractures. Conventionally, this decision was based solely upon the degree of fracture displacement. However, in the last ten years, there has been a move to incorporate patient characteristics into the decision making process. Research demonstrating that joint replacement renders superior functional results when compared with IF, in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures, has swayed the pendulum in favour of THR. However, a high risk of dislocation has always been the concern. Fortunately, there are newer technologies and alternative surgical approaches that can help reduce the risk of dislocation. The authors propose an algorithm for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: if minimally displaced, in the absence of hip joint arthritis, IF should be performed; if arthritis is present, or the fracture is displaced, then THR is preferred.

publication date

  • November 1, 2014

Research

keywords

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
  • Femoral Neck Fractures
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
  • Hip Prosthesis

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84919650370

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34334

PubMed ID

  • 25381407

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 96-B

issue

  • 11 Supple A