Fixed Bearings versus Rotating Platforms in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Rotating platforms were introduced as an alternative to fixed bearings in hopes of providing more natural kinematics and improved clinical outcomes. In-vitro wear studies showed significantly less wear with rotating platforms as opposed to fixed-bearing designs. Kinematic follow-up studies showed significantly improved axial rotation with rotating-platform knees. However, these benefits have failed to translate into improved clinical outcomes or survivorship. This article reviews our institution's experience, as well as the latest clinical research on wear, kinematics, clinical outcomes, and survivorship of fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knees.

publication date

  • May 5, 2015

Research

keywords

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
  • Knee Prosthesis
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84941898266

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1055/s-0035-1550338

PubMed ID

  • 25942367

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 28

issue

  • 5