Retrospective Assessment of the Utility of Imaging, Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy, and Intraoperative Frozen Section in the Management of Parotid Neoplasms: The Weill Cornell Medical College Experience.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Preoperative identification of malignant parotid lesions remains challenging, and thus, some surgeons use frozen section (FS) to assist them in their decision making. We evaluated the pathologic and cost benefit of FS after fine-needle aspiration (FNA) at our institution. METHODS: We assessed medical data for 260 patients undergoing parotidectomy with FS. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for radiology, FNA, and FS. RESULTS: The sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of FNA and FS were 75.0, 96.4, and 93.2%, and 75.0, 100, and 96.8%, respectively. FS detected 0% of FNA false negatives and 80% of false positives. The additional pathology charge for FS alone per correctly identified benign lesion after a positive FNA was USD 1,443. CONCLUSION: FNA and FS are more reliable in the prognostication of the final pathology than radiology. At our center, FS appears to be of limited clinical use after benign FNAs, but may be more useful after positive, indeterminate, and nondiagnostic FNAs.