Impact of intraprocedural thrombotic events on short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention. Evidence from a meta-analysis. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: Data regarding the effects of intraprocedural thrombotic events (IPTE) are scarce. Hence we aim to perform a meta-analysis to examine the outcomes of IPTE compared to non-IPTE during PCI. METHODS: We performed a literature search of all published full-length articles of studies that reported data on patients with IPTE compared with non-IPTE during PCI. We calculated odd ratios via random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 26,697 patients, of which 1572 patients had IPTE, were included in this analysis. In-hospital, IPTE was associated with higher mortality (odds ratio (OR) 5.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) [2.31, 12.41]; p<0.0001), myocardial infarction (MI) and major bleeding compared to non-IPTE. At 30 days, IPTE was also associated with higher mortality (OR 4.57, 95% CI [2.43, 8.60]; p<0.0001), MI, repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis and major bleeding compared to non-IPTE group. IPTE was also associated with higher long-term mortality (OR 2.19, 95% CI [1.35, 3.53]; p=0.001). Among IPTE patients, intraprocedural stent thrombosis was associated with greater odds of MI compared to both no reflow and distal embolization events. CONCLUSION: IPTE during PCI is associated with more adverse ischemic events, including mortality, during the index hospitalization, at 30 days and long-term.

publication date

  • September 26, 2015

Research

keywords

  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Thrombosis

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84960155276

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.09.030

PubMed ID

  • 26436676

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 202