Alloplastic Augmentation of the Asian Face: A Review of 215 Patients. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: Asian aesthetic surgery has become increasingly popular over the last decade, especially augmentation of characteristically flattened facial features. Alloplastic implants are an option for facial augmentation, however many avoid their use due to concerns for morbidity associated with their use. OBJECTIVES: To validate our hypothesis that when used properly, alloplastic implants have a low complication profile and provides excellent aesthetic results. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all Asian patients undergoing alloplastic facial augmentation between 2009 and 2013 by a single surgeon. Procedures included augmentation of the forehead, nasal dorsum, midface, and chin. Charts were reviewed for outcomes including infection, extrusion, malposition, and operative revision. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifteen patients had 243 implants placed. Of 141 nasal augmentations, there were 2 infections (1.4%), 1 extrusion (0.7%), 7 malpositions (4.9%), and 16 revisions (11.3%), 5 for malposition, 2 for contour irregularity, and 9 for aesthetic change. Augmentation genioplasty was performed in 40 patients with 1 malposition (2.5%) and 6 revisions (15%), 4 for under-correction and 2 for aesthetic change. Thirty-one midface and 31 forehead augmentations were performed without complications. One patient (3.2%) had forehead implant removal for aesthetic change. Overall infection and extrusion rates were 0.8% and 0.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By utilizing surgical techniques such as creation of a precise sub-periosteal pocket, placing the implant away from the incision site, and leaving well-vascularized soft tissue coverage under minimal tension, alloplastic implants can safely be used as a first-line option for Asian facial augmentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Therapeutic.

publication date

  • March 1, 2016

Research

keywords

  • Face
  • Prostheses and Implants
  • Surgery, Plastic

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84994860495

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1093/asj/sjw013

PubMed ID

  • 26931309

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 36

issue

  • 8