Open Versus Minimally Invasive Fixation Techniques for Thoracolumbar Trauma: A Meta-Analysis. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Study DesignSystematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies published in English. ObjectiveThis study evaluated differences in outcome variables between percutaneous and open pedicle screws for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. MethodsA systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was performed. The variables of interest included postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, kyphosis angle, and vertebral body height, as well as intraoperative blood loss and operative time. The results were pooled by calculating the effect size based on the standardized difference in means. The studies were weighted by the inverse of the variance, which included both within- and between-study error. Confidence intervals were reported at 95%. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I (2). ResultsAfter two-reviewer assessment, 38 studies were eliminated. Six studies were found to meet inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The combined effect size was found to be in favor of percutaneous fixation for blood loss and operative time (p < 0.05); however, there were no differences in vertebral body height (VBH), kyphosis angle, or VAS scores between open and percutaneous fixation. All of the studies demonstrated relative homogeneity, with I (2) < 25. ConclusionsPatients with thoracolumbar fractures can be effectively managed with percutaneous or open pedicle screw placement. There are no differences in VBH, kyphosis angle, or VAS between the two groups. Blood loss and operative time were decreased in the percutaneous group, which may represent a potential benefit, particularly in the polytraumatized patient. All variables in this study demonstrated near-perfect homogeneity, and the effect is likely close to the true effect.

publication date

  • June 5, 2015

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC4771513

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85009717277

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1055/s-0035-1554777

PubMed ID

  • 26933621

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 6

issue

  • 2