Patient-Specific Guides/Instrumentation in Shoulder Arthroplasty. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Optimal outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty TSA and reverse shoulder arthroplasty RSA are dependent on proper implant position. Multiple cadaver studies have demonstrated improved accuracy of implant positioning with use of patient-specific guides/instrumentation compared to traditional methods. At this time, there are 3 commercially available single use patient-specific instrumentation systems and 1 commercially available reusable patient-specific instrumentation system. Currently though, there are no studies comparing the clinical outcomes of patient-specific guides to those of traditional methods of glenoid placement, and limited research has been done comparing the accuracy of each system's 3-dimensional planning software. Future work is necessary to elucidate the ideal indications for the use of patient-specific guides and instrumentation, but it is likely, particularly in the setting of advanced glenoid deformity, that these systems will improve a surgeon's ability to put the implant in the best position possible.

publication date

  • February 1, 2018

Research

keywords

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder
  • Precision Medicine
  • Shoulder Joint
  • Shoulder Prosthesis

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85052843515

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.12788/ajo.2018.0013

PubMed ID

  • 29494718

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 47

issue

  • 2