Gene Expression Differences in Host Response to Schistosoma haematobium Infection. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Schistosome worms infect over 200 million people worldwide. They live in the host's bloodstream and alter host immunity. Epidemiological data suggest that males and females have different responses to schistosome infection, but the effect of sex on systemic response is undetermined. Our objective was to characterize differences in peripheral blood transcriptional profiles in people with or without active Schistosoma haematobium infection and to determine whether this signature differs between males and females. mRNA was isolated using poly(A) selection and sequenced on an Illumina Hi-Seq4000 platform. Transcripts were aligned to the human hg19 reference genome and counted with the HTSeq package. Genes were compared for differential expression using DESeq2. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was used to identify gene networks altered in the presence of S. haematobium We enrolled 33 participants from villages in rural Tanzania where S. haematobium is endemic. After correction for multiple comparisons, we observed 383 differentially expressed genes between those with or without S. haematobium infection when sex was included as a covariate. Heat-mapping of the genes with >1.5-fold differences in gene expression revealed clustering by S. haematobium infection status. The top networks included development, cell death and survival, cell signaling, and immunologic disease pathways. We observed a distinct whole blood transcriptional profile, as well as differences in men and women, with S. haematobium infection. Additional studies are needed to determine the clinical effects of these divergent responses. Attention to sex-based differences should be included in studies of human schistosome infection.

publication date

  • December 19, 2018

Research

keywords

  • Blood Cells
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Host-Pathogen Interactions
  • Schistosoma haematobium
  • Schistosomiasis haematobia

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC6300631

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85058891384

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

PubMed ID

  • 30323023

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 87

issue

  • 1