Probable Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Lower Respiratory Symptoms Among Rescue/Recovery Workers and Community Members After the 9/11 World Trade Center Attacks-A Longitudinal Mediation Analysis.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
OBJECTIVE: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and lower respiratory symptoms (LRS) often coexist among survivors of the September 11, 2001 (9/11) World Trade Center (WTC) attacks. Research in police and nontraditional responders suggests that PTSD mediates the relationship between 9/11 physical exposures and LRS, but not vice versa. We replicated these findings in WTC rescue/recovery workers (R/R workers), extended them to exposed community members, and explored the interplay between both physical and psychological 9/11 exposures, probable PTSD, and LRS over a 10-year follow-up. METHODS: Participants were 12,398 R/R workers and 12,745 community members assessed in three WTC Health Registry surveys (2003-2004, 2006-2007, and 2011-2012). LRS and 9/11 exposures were self-reported. Probable PTSD was defined as a PTSD Checklist score ≥44. RESULTS: Probable PTSD predicted LRS (R/R workers: β = 0.88-0.98, p < .001; community members: β = 0.67-0.86, p < .001) and LRS predicted PTSD (R/R workers: β = 0.83-0.91, p < .001; community members: β = 0.68-0.75, p < .001) at follow-ups, adjusting for prior symptoms and covariates. In both R/R workers and community members, probable PTSD mediated the relationship between 9/11 physical exposures (dust cloud, long duration of work) and LRS (indirect effects, p = .001-.006), and LRS mediated the physical exposure-PTSD relationship (indirect effects, p = .001-.006). In R/R workers, probable PTSD mediated the psychological exposure (losing friends or loved ones, witnessing horrific events)-LRS relationship (indirect effect, p < .001), but LRS did not mediate the psychological exposure-PTSD relationship (indirect effect, p = .332). In community members, high 9/11 psychological exposure predicted both probable PTSD and LRS at follow-ups; probable PTSD mediated the psychological exposure-LRS relationship (indirect effect, p < .001), and LRS mediated the psychological exposure-PTSD relationship (indirect effect, p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Probable PTSD and LRS each mediated the other, with subtle differences between R/R workers and community members. A diagnosis of either should trigger assessment for the other; treatment should be carefully coordinated.
