Resuscitating Patient Rights during the Pandemic: COVID-19 and the Risk of Resurgent Paternalism. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • The COVID-19 Pandemic a stress test for clinical medicine and medical ethics, with a confluence over questions of the proportionality of resuscitation. Drawing upon his experience as a clinical ethicist during the surge in New York City during the Spring of 2020, the author considers how attitudes regarding resuscitation have evolved since the inception of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders decades ago. Sharing a personal narrative about a DNR quandry he encountered as a medical intern, the author considers the balance of patient rights versus clinical discretion, warning about the risk of resurgent physician paternalism dressed up in the guise of a public health crisis.

publication date

  • August 19, 2020

Research

keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Paternalism
  • Patient Rights
  • Resuscitation Orders

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC7438624

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85087344131

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1017/S0963180120000535

PubMed ID

  • 32576307

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 30

issue

  • 2