Low compliance to guidelines in nonmuscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: A systematic review. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • PURPOSE: This systematic review assessed compliance to guidelines for the management of nonmuscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC). METHODS: The PUBMED, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched in November 2019 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. RESULTS: Fifteen studies incorporating a collective total of 10,575 NMIBC patients were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. We found that the rates of compliance were 53.0% with a single immediate intravesical instillation in patients with presumed low or intermediate risk, 37.1% with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin or chemotherapy in those with intermediate risk, 43.4% with performance of a second transurethral resection in high-risk patients, 32.5% with administration of adjuvant intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin in high-risk patients, 36.1% with radical cystectomy in highest-risk patients, and 82.2% with cystoscopy for follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with NMIBC guidelines remains low. Better guideline education and understanding holds the key to achieving high compliance. Strategies to improve guideline compliance at the physician level are urgently required.

publication date

  • July 10, 2020

Research

keywords

  • Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Medical Oncology
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
  • Urology

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85087696050

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.013

PubMed ID

  • 32654948

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 38

issue

  • 10