Surgical Anatomy Applied to the Resection of Craniopharyngiomas: Anatomic Compartments and Surgical Classifications.

Overview

abstract

BACKGROUND: Resective surgery remains the main treatment option for most patients with craniopharyngiomas. Understanding of the microsurgical anatomy of the sella and suprasellar region and its relationship with these tumors is necessary to achieve effective surgical treatment and minimize complications. In this article, we review the surgical anatomy related to craniopharyngiomas and divide it in 5 compartments according to tumor extension. METHODS: Endoscopic and microsurgical dissection were performed in 3 freshly injected cadaver heads at the Weill Cornell Surgical Innovations Laboratory (New York, New York, USA) and at the Surgical Skills Center at Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). Tumor extension was classified as 1) inferomedial or sellar, 2) superomedial or suprasellar, 3) lateral or sylvian, 4) posterior or interpeduncular/prepontine, and 5) intraventricular. The selection of surgical approaches is discussed based on the anatomic nuances of each these regions. In addition, we reviewed the literature regarding previous anatomic classifications for resection of craniopharyngiomas. RESULTS: Different approaches should be considered according to tumor extension into different compartments. Purely sellar tumors are amenable to endoscopic transsellar approaches, whereas those with a suprasellar extension require an extended transtuberculum approach. In some of those patients, a narrow chiasm-pituitary window may block access to the tumor and a transcranial translamina terminalis approach may be favored. Tumors occupying the interpeduncular fossa may pose a significant challenge for an endoscopic endonasal approach and transcranial approaches. Transcavernous approaches and anterior and posterior clinoidectomies may be required for adequate exposure in such patients. Translamina terminalis and/or transcallosal approaches are recommended for resection of purely intraventricular tumors. Tumors extending into the lateral compartment should be considered for transcranial frontotemporal approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The understanding of such anatomic nuances aids in the selection of the most appropriate surgical approach and in the prevention of potential complications. Because most craniopharyngiomas are midline lesions, the endoscopic endonasal approach represents an excellent approach for most of those tumors. However, transcranial approaches should be considered for tumors with extension into the lateral compartment and for selected tumors involving the ventricular compartment (purely intraventricular tumors and those with extension to the foramen of Monro and/or lateral ventricles).