Methodological Standards for the Design, Implementation, and Analysis of Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Cardiac surgery presents specific methodological challenges in the design, implementation, and analysis of randomized controlled trials. The purposes of this scientific statement are to review key standards in cardiac surgery randomized trial design and implementation, and to provide recommendations for conducting and interpreting cardiac surgery trials. Recommendations include a careful evaluation of the suitability of the research question for a clinical trial, assessment of clinical equipoise, feasibility of enrolling a representative patient cohort, impact of practice variations on the safety and efficacy of the study intervention, likelihood and impact of crossover, and duration of follow-up. Trial interventions and study end points should be predefined, and appropriate strategies must be used to ensure adequate deliverability of the trial interventions. Every effort must be made to ensure a high completeness of follow-up; trial design and analytic techniques must be tailored to the specific research question and trial setting.

authors

  • Gaudino, Mario Fl
  • Chikwe, Joanna
  • Bagiella, Emilia
  • Bhatt, Deepak L
  • Doenst, Torsten
  • Fremes, Stephen E
  • Lawton, Jennifer
  • Masterson Creber, Ruth M
  • Sade, Robert M
  • Zwischenberger, Brittany A

publication date

  • December 6, 2021

Research

keywords

  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85123879026

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001037

PubMed ID

  • 34865513

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 145

issue

  • 4