Diagnostic ultrasound of tendon injuries in the setting of distal radius fractures. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: Describe tendon injuries and their structural causes seen on ultrasound in wrists with distal radius fractures and estimate the accuracy of ultrasound and its impact on clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrasounds of 226 wrists (221 patients) with distal radius fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Ultrasound findings of tendon injuries and their structural causes were correlated with surgery and clinical outcome. Accuracy and inter- and intra-observer reproducibilities were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-five wrists were treated non-operatively while 201 underwent surgery. Ultrasound demonstrated hardware contact with flexor pollicis longus (FPL) in 76 wrists, extensor pollicis longus (EPL) in 21, and other tendons in 94. Ultrasound identified tendon ruptures in 23 wrists (13 EPL/8 FPL/2 extensor indicis proprius (EIP)), most of which were surgically confirmed. Among 12 wrists with confirmed EPL ruptures, distal radius fracture had been treated with volar plating in 6 and non-operatively in 6, and ultrasound showed osseous irregularity at the rupture site in 8. All FPL ruptures occurred in wrists with volar plating. Ultrasound findings were concordant with subsequent clinical management in most. In 2, ultrasound findings led to the decision to remove hardware despite lack of symptoms. Ultrasound had sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 88/99/98% for identifying a specific tendon as ruptured and 88/87/88% for tendon abnormalities in general. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibilities were excellent (kappa = 0.85 ~ 1.0). CONCLUSION: Certain wrist tendons, particularly EPL and FPL, are vulnerable after distal radius fractures. Ultrasound is accurate and useful for detecting tendon injury and sources of tendon irritation and can guide clinical management.

publication date

  • January 11, 2022

Research

keywords

  • Radius Fractures
  • Tendon Injuries

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85122874819

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.11.004

PubMed ID

  • 35013998

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 51

issue

  • 7