Conceptualizing Biological Aging and Frailty in Orthopaedics: A Framework for Clinical Practice. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • ➤: Biological aging can best be conceptualized clinically as a combination of 3 components: frailty, comorbidity, and disability. ➤: Despite advancements in the understanding of senescence, chronological age remains the best estimate of biological age. However, a useful exercise for practitioners is to look beyond chronological age in clinical and surgical decision-making. ➤: A chronologically aging person does not age biologically at the same rate. ➤: The best way to understand frailty is to consider it as a physical phenotype. ➤: Physical optimization should parallel medical optimization before elective surgery. ➤: The poorer the host (both in terms of bone quality and propensity for healing), the more robust the implant construct must be to minimize reliance on host biology.

publication date

  • March 11, 2022

Research

keywords

  • Frailty
  • Orthopedics

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85134243241

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.2106/JBJS.21.01053

PubMed ID

  • 35275895

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 104

issue

  • 13