OKT3 treatment of steroid-resistant renal allograft rejection.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
The monoclonal antibody, Orthoclone OKT3 (OKT3), has been used with great efficacy in a prospective multicenter trial as therapy for first rejection episodes in cadaveric donor (CD) renal allograft recipients treated with azathioprine (AZA) and prednisone (P). However, although almost all rejection episodes were reversed, recurrent rejection occurred in approximately two-thirds of OKT3-treated patients in this earlier trial; infections also occurred in about two-thirds of patients, often related to the additional immunosuppression necessary to reverse the rerejection episodes. In the current series of patients, OKT3 was used to treat rejection in CD renal graft recipients in a protocol differing from the multicenter trial in two respects: baseline immunosuppression was cyclosporine (CsA) and P or CsA, AZA, and P (probably more potent immunosuppressive combinations than the AZA and P in the multicenter trial); and OKT3 treatment was reserved for rejection episodes resistant to 3 bolus infusions of methylprednisolone (MP), 5-10 mg/kg, rather than as primary therapy for first rejection episodes. Using this protocol, 46 of 74 rejection episodes (62%) diagnosed between 3/85 and 3/86 in CD renal allograft recipients were treated successfully with MP. Of the remaining 28 steroid-resistant rejection episodes, 27 (96%) were reversed with a 7-14-day course of OKT3, 5 mg/day. Only 5 recurrent rejection episodes (19%) have been observed in the 2-14-month follow-up period after OKT3 treatment; infections have occurred in 10 patients (36%), and three grafts (11%) have been lost in OKT3 treated patients. These results suggest that recurrent rejection and subsequent infection after OKT3 is used to treat rejection may be reduced in a protocol where CD renal allograft recipients are treated with baseline immunosuppression regimens including CsA and where OKT3 is reserved for steroid-resistant rejection. This approach appears to be both more cost-effective than, and as effective therapeutically as, treating all first rejection episodes with the monoclonal antibody.
