The Effect of Presurgical and Postsurgical Topical Tacrolimus on Pedicled Flap Survival in Rats: A Pilot Study.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
PURPOSE: Our previous rodent studies demonstrated significantly decreased full-thickness necrosis in pedicled dorsal skin flaps with topical tacrolimus as compared with petroleum jelly. Histologically, we found that topical tacrolimus was correlated with increased vascular growth in areas more susceptible to ischemic damage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential benefits of pretreatment with tacrolimus. By applying tacrolimus in advance of raising the dorsal skin flaps, we hoped to increase vascularity and thus increase the overall viability of the flaps. METHODS: Twenty Sprague-Dawley rats were initially randomized to 4 groups based on timing of tacrolimus treatment (presurgical/postsurgical treatment): control/control (C/C), control/tacrolimus (C/T), tacrolimus/control (T/C), and tacrolimus/tacrolimus (T/T). Treatments consisted of 0.2 g of the control (topical petroleum jelly) and 0.1% topical tacrolimus to the rat dorsum twice per day. After 7 days of presurgical treatment, a cranially based dorsal skin flap measuring 3 × 10 cm was created. Two rats perished during surgery and were excluded for further analysis. Each rat was treated for a further 7 days and sacrificed. Two blinded reviewers marked the total skin flap area as well as areas of viable tissue, reversible ischemia, and full-thickness necrosis. Percentage areas were calculated using Fiji/ImageJ, and statistical analysis was performed in R. RESULTS: The average viable areas for C/C, C/T, T/C, and T/T were 31.4%, 31.9%, 35.6%, and 22.6%, respectively. The average reversible ischemic area for C/C, C/T, T/C, and T/T was 53.1%, 54.0%, 54.1%, and 71.5%, respectively. The average necrotic area for C/C, C/T, T/C, and T/T was 15.4%, 14.0%, 10.2%, and 5.9%, respectively. For areas of reversible ischemia, T/T arm had higher areas compared with C/T (P = 0.004) and T/C (P = 0.044). There was no significance between treatment arms for areas of viable and necrotic tissue. CONCLUSIONS: We observed higher areas of reversible ischemia for continuous tacrolimus treatment compared with only pre-tacrolimus application or post-tacrolimus application. This suggests that tacrolimus application before and after surgical insult may be associated with improved ischemic survival of the skin. Although we did not observe decreased areas of necrosis for tacrolimus treatment compared with control, this was likely due to the limited number of rats available in each arm to reach significance. Further study is needed to fully elucidate the encouraging trends that were observed.
