A Comparison of Microwave Ablation and Cryoablation for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Review uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: The systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies published in English from January 2006-February 2022 that assessed adults with primary RCC who received MWA or cryoablation were included. Study arms from RCTs, comparative observational, and single-arm studies were eligible. The outcomes included local tumor recurrence (LTR), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall/major complications, procedure/ablation time, 1-3-month primary technique efficacy, and technical success. Single-arm meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model. Sensitivity analyses excluding low-quality studies assessed using the MINORs scale were performed. Univariable and multivariable examined the effects of prognostic factors. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups and mean tumor size for MWA and cryoablation were 2.74 cm and 2.69 cm. Single-arm meta-analyses were similar for LTR and secondary outcomes between cryoablation and MWA. Ablation time was significantly shorter with MWA than with cryoablation (meta-regression weighted mean difference 24.55 mins, 95% CI -31.71, -17.38, p < 0.0001). One-year LTR was significantly lower with MWA than cryoablation (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.10-0.93, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: MWA provides significantly improved 1-year LTR and ablation time compared with cryoablation for patients with RCC. Other outcomes appeared similar or favorable for MWA; however, results were not statistically significant. MWA of primary RCC is as safe and effective as cryoablation, which should be confirmed with future comparative studies.

publication date

  • June 16, 2023

Identity

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.001

PubMed ID

  • 37331485