Augmented Virtual Examination for Cosmetic and Functional Rhinoplasty.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
Background: Few studies have critically evaluated the quality of data obtained during telemedical evaluations of patients with nasal complaints. Objective: To compare the quality of data provided by remote endoscopic and external nasal examination with those by in-person evaluations for rhinoplasty and functional nasal surgery, measured by detectability of anatomic features, and to assess associated patient experience measured by reported ease, discomfort, and likelihood of peer recommendation. Materials and Methods: Twenty healthy subjects performed a nasal self-examination using an endoscope and webcam under remote videoconferencing service (VCS) guidance. They subsequently underwent in-person examination and were surveyed about their experience. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using kappa coefficients. Detectability of anatomic features by in-person versus virtual examination was compared using Wilcoxon and chi-square tests. Results: Median subject age was 27.5 years (range 23-77). Kappa coefficients were 0.78 for in-person and 0.66 for virtual evaluations. Only the internal nasal valve and inferior turbinate were better visualized in person. There were no differences between detectability of external features on in-person versus virtual examinations. Subjects' average likelihood of recommending this technology (1-10) was 8.65 (SD 1.4). Conclusions: Intranasal examination by physician-guided remote endoscopy and webcam-based facial analysis demonstrate nasal anatomy comparable with in-person evaluation and anterior rhinoscopy.
