A prospective randomized comparison of Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene aortic bifurcation grafts. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results of Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) aortic bifurcation grafts in a prospective randomized manner. METHODS: Sixty patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease were randomized to receive Dacron or PTFE bifurcation grafts. Preoperative risk factors, perioperative blood loss and fluid requirements, and postoperative complications were compared. A mean follow-up of 57 months was achieved. RESULTS: The immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar in the two groups, and the long-term complications were low in number and comparable. The cumulative patency rate for Dacron graft limbs was 86% versus 95% for PTFE graft limbs. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were noted between the results achieved with Dacron and PTFE aortic bifurcation grafts.

publication date

  • January 1, 1995

Research

keywords

  • Aortic Diseases
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis
  • Iliac Artery
  • Polyethylene Terephthalates
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 0028796037

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/s0039-6060(05)80223-5

PubMed ID

  • 7809840

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 117

issue

  • 1